Pipeline Run Telemetry

How this run was built

13 agents · same phases as portfolio.nltlabs.ai/pipeline. Cards show live stats from pipeline-run.json.

13
Agents
37m 54s
Wall
$2.89
Cost
45
Source URLs
Phase 1 — Evaluation13m 23s · 8 agents
Parallel · 6
claude-sonnet-4-6
Market Researcher
TAM/SAM/SOM sizing + customer voice
⏱ 52s 💵 $0.07 🛠 0 🔗 8
complete confidence 65%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Competitive Analyst
Competitor teardown + funding + moat score
⏱ 2m 02s 💵 $0.40 🛠 0 🔗 11
complete confidence 72%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Feasibility Analyst
Tech architecture + build risks
⏱ 1m 51s 💵 $0.15 🛠 0 🔗 7
complete confidence 70%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Financial Modeler
Unit economics + revenue projections
⏱ 1m 46s 💵 $0.12 🛠 0 🔗 5
complete confidence 55%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Regulatory Analyst
Compliance + jurisdictional risk
⏱ 1m 32s 💵 $0.12 🛠 0 🔗 14
complete confidence 82%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Creative Director
Brand name + tagline + positioning
⏱ 1m 13s 💵 $0.12 🛠 0
complete confidence 79%
claude-opus-4-6
Devil's Advocate
Stress-tests bull claims, surfaces fatal flaws
⏱ 3m 10s 💵 $0.19 🛠 0
complete confidence 82%
claude-opus-4-6
PE Firm
9-lens rubric, score, fund/no-fund verdict
⏱ 54s 💵 $0.24 🛠 0
complete confidence 78%
Phase 2 — Build24m 31s · 5 agents
claude-opus-4-6
POC Director
Locks thesis, slug, brief, downstream specs
⏱ 3m 12s 💵 $0.53 🛠 0
complete confidence 82%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Product Designer
Hardware BOM + 3D + electrical spec
⏱ 5s 💵 $0.03 🛠 0
complete confidence 100%
Parallel · 2
claude-sonnet-4-6
Web Designer
Visual differentiation + brand tokens
⏱ 3m 51s 💵 $0.35 🛠 0
complete confidence 88%
claude-sonnet-4-6
Copywriter
Research-first, pain-led copy
⏱ 4m 20s 💵 $0.57 🛠 0
complete
claude-opus-4-6
Frontend Builder
Astro site, /inside two-door, deploy
⏱ 13m 00s 💵 $0.00 🛠 0
failed
Quality Scorecard
0
Cited
8
Derived
0
Assumed
78%
Avg confidence

Honest gaps are visible. Assumed = model projection. Derived = formula from cited inputs. Cited = named source.

Key Decisions
  • [firm] Verdict
    PASS · 38/100

    Complio identifies a real underserved wedge — trade-specific, state-specific compliance docs at SMB price — but the execution case collapses under three converging problems. First, regulatory: California's OLDA statute (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 6400-6415) requires county-clerk registration plus a $25K surety bond per county, and credible multi-state UPL opinions run $2.5K-$5K each — meaning real launch compliance is $37.5K-$50K against a $19.5K seed budget. Second, unit economics: the celebrated 9.8:1 LTV:CAC rests on a $49 CAC back-calculation with zero channel validation; trade-pub CPL data implies realized CAC of $480-$2,300, collapsing LTV:CAC toward 1:1. Third, product-regulatory contradiction: the 'state-change alert' feature positioned as the retention moat is the precise feature the regulatory brief flags as UPL in CA/NY/IL — the creative thesis and the legal reality are irreconcilable as written. The moat is thin (3/10), Levelset can copy the SMB price point in a quarter, and Year-1 churn for a single-purpose doc generator will materially exceed the borrowed 7.6% Jobber benchmark. Pass with re-evaluation if founders return with funded OLDA path, restructured alert feature, and observed CAC.

  • [firm] Next step
    Next step

    Send pass note to founders with the three specific re-evaluation gates: funded OLDA path, restructured alert feature, observed CAC

  • [firm] Next step
    Next step

    Schedule 6-month check-in to review whether gates have been cleared

  • [firm] Next step
    Next step

    Flag Levelset/Procore SMB pricing moves as a competitive monitoring item

  • [firm] Next step
    Next step

    Add Complio to monitor list with quarterly review cadence

  • [dev] Fatal flaw
    Fatal flaw

    California's OLDA registration statute (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 6400-6415) requires a $25,000 surety bond per county of operation plus affirmative county-clerk registration — not satisfied by disclosure, attorney review, or a jurisdiction filter. California has 58 counties and represents 15-20% of the US licensed contractor market. The budget allocates $1,250 for all five launch states combined. CA compliance alone requires $30,000+ before a single California contractor is served. This creates a binary choice with no good answer: exclude CA and write off 15-20% of claimed SAM, or absorb regulatory costs that consume the entire $19,500 seed budget before a line of code ships.

  • [dev] Fatal flaw
    Fatal flaw

    The 'state-changes alert' product feature as described constitutes legal advice, not scrivener activity, in CA, NY, and IL — the three highest-density contractor markets in the launch set. Notifying a subscriber that a statute 'has changed and may affect their compliance' is the functional definition of legal counsel. This feature is simultaneously the pitch's primary retention mechanism and its primary UPL exposure. Restructuring it to raw statutory citations kills the differentiation; keeping it as designed invites enforcement action. The creative brief and the regulatory reality are irreconcilable as written.

  • [dev] Fatal flaw
    Fatal flaw

    The $1,250 UPL opinion letter budget is understated by a factor of 10-25x. Market rate for credible multi-state scrivener-model opinions from legal-tech-savvy counsel is $2,500-$5,000 per state; CA OLDA compliance alone (bond + opinion) exceeds $30,000. Five-state launch regulatory compliance costs $37,500-$50,000 at market rates — the entire $19,500 seed round is insufficient to achieve regulatory compliance before the first customer is acquired. The mitigation plan is not a mitigation; it is a misunderstanding of the statutory requirement.

Showing first 8 of 19 decisions.

Source URLs cited (45)

Pipeline v3.2 · run 2026-05-07 · pe=5a292858 · poc=91cefb3c